We The People   
of Brunswick County NC     

Recent News

 

Illegal Immigration

The fight against illegal immigration has accelerated over the last year from Arizona to, most recently, Alabama. States across the country have taken the responsibility that federal government has relinquished. Regular polling reveals that a majority of Americans favor halting the flow of illegal aliens across the border. Despite the wishes of the American people, neither party has effectively stood for the defense of our borders and our sovereignty.

In the 24 years since President Reagan signed an amnesty bill into law, the federal government has failed to protect the borders. The situation on the U.S.-Mexico border has become anarchy. Drug trafficking, human trafficking and massive illegal immigration have caused a volatile situation. On March 30, 2010, an American rancher by the name of Robert Krentz was found shot to death on his 34,000-acre ranch in Arizona. The local sheriff’s department suspected Krentz was killed by illegal aliens, and Arizona demanded that the state take action in response to the federal government’s nonchalant attitude on the issue. At the time of the murder, Tucson, Ariz., had become the crime capital of America. From 2007 to 2009, the city of half a million had more than 1,000 kidnappings and nearly 7,000 cases of assault.

Appealing to the will of her constituents, Gov. Jan Brewer signed SB 1070 into law on April 23, 2010. The controversial law made it a crime for an illegal alien to be in the state of Arizona—shocking! Despite the attempts by several liberal groups to boycott Arizona, all measures failed. According to the Phoenix News Times, resorts saw a major tourism increase compared with 2009. Several other states such as Georgia, Alabama and South Carolina have followed Arizona in protecting their citizens and the sovereignty of the United States. Following SB 1070, the democratically controlled lame-duck session attempted to pass the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act, a bill that would have granted citizenship to an estimated 2 million illegal minors living in the country. Due to a grassroots outcry from the American people, Republicans who had previously supported the bill as well as a handful of moderate Democrats, flipped positions and defeated the legislation in the Senate. Following the defeat of the DREAM Act, the governor of Maryland, Martin O’Malley, signed a bill granting instate tuition for illegal aliens. The people of Maryland responded by collecting more than 109,000 signatures to put a repeal of the law on the ballot in 2012.

Federal Budget 101

The U.S. Congress sets a federal budget every year in the trillions of dollars. Few people
know how much money that is so we created a breakdown of federal spending in simple terms. Let's put the 2011 federal budget into perspective:

  • U.S. income: $2,170,000,000,000
  • Federal budget: $3,820,000,000,000
  • New debt: $1,650,000,000,000
  • National debt: $14,271,000,000,000
  • Recent budget cut: $38,500,000,000 (about 1 percent of the budget)


It helps to think about these numbers in terms that we can relate to. Let's remove eight zeros
from these numbers
and pretend this is the household budget for the fictitious Jones family.

  • Total annual income for the Jones family: $21,700
  • Amount of money the Jones family spent: $38,200
  • Amount of new debt added to the credit card: $16,500
  • Outstanding balance on the credit card: $142,710
  • Amount cut from the budget: $385


So in effect last month Congress, or in this example the Jones family, sat down at the kitchen
table and agreed to cut $385 from its annual budget. What family would cut $385 of spending
in order to solve $16,500 in deficit spending?

It is a start, although hardly a solution.

Now after years of this, the Jones family has $142,710 of debt on its credit card (which is the equivalent of the national debt).

You would think the Jones family would recognize and address this situation, but it does not. Neither does Congress.

The root of the debt problem is that the voters typically do not send people to Congress to save money. They are sent there to bring home the bacon to their own home state.

To effect budget change, we need to change the job description and give Congress new
marching orders.

It is awfully hard (but not impossible) to reverse course and tell the government to stop borrowing money from our children and spending it now.

In effect, what we have is a reverse mortgage on the country. The problem is that the voters have become addicted to the money. Moreover, the American voters are still in the denial stage, and do not want to face the possibility of going into rehab.

By: DAVID THOMAS
Chief Executive Officer
Equitas Capital Advisors LLC




8/11/2011

Blame Obama for the Wrecked Economy

President Obama, the Democratic Party and their members of Congress have spent years blaming former President George W. Bush for the nation's current economic woes, which is akin to blaming the bank's tellers for a bank robbery, or for the dishonesty of their bosses, the bank's executives who were looting the till.

Nobody in the left-dominated media bothers to note that in the last years of the Bush presidency Democrats controlled the Congress and thus had a death grip on the nation's economy, having complete control over the nation's purse strings.

They spent and spent and spent the yet-uncollected taxes of future generations — as well as our own — as if there were no tomorrow.

It wasn't a Bush Congress that jammed the incredible costs of Obamacare down the throats of the American people and their children and grandchildren — it was our spendthrift president and his allies on Capitol Hill doing their classic imitation of the legendary drunken sailors on shore leave.

It's simply common sense to understand that spending money one doesn't have in the hopes that the future will provide the needed funds is something like believing that some beneficent tooth fairy will come up with the money in the future.

Now the president and the national Democratic Party have suddenly discovered a scapegoat for the latest economic mess they have thrust upon the American people. They insist that the credit-rating downgrade was the fault of the tea party trying to control the nation's purse strings. I'm not kidding. They really expect us to swallow this whopper as the gospel truth.

They expect us to ignore the fact that the millions of tea party members are simply Americans deeply and sincerely concerned about the nation's economy and the tendency of the government to spend their hard-earned tax money on whatever scam strikes its fancy.

It's time to place the blame for our economic malaise where it belongs — on the shoulders of the Obama administration and the Democrats in Congress.

Tea party members have been the voice of reason, not the wild-eyed terrorists portrayed by the left's crazy spin doctors.

What would have averted the credit-rating downgrade and the subsequent turmoil in the markets? Precisely the spending cuts advocated by the tea party.

According to a statement by Jenny Beth Martin, a co-founder and national coordinator of the Tea Party Patriots, the debt-ceiling compromise was full of "accounting tricks and minor 'cuts' to spending." She warns that these so-called cuts do not reduce our national debt. They are simply cuts to future deficit spending.

Rather than prevent a crisis, the debt deal has "already cost us our AAA credit rating," according to Martin.

In addition, she explains that the tea party was the only organization pushing for the passage of the Full Faith and Credit Act, which would remove the threat of a national default.

A couple of hundred years ago, a band of American patriots demonstrated their contempt for a distant parliament that imposed unjust taxation upon citizens, with no say in the matter, by dumping British-taxed tea in Boston Harbor. It was one of the acts of defiance that helped spark the American Revolution and created a new nation.

Unlike the Boston tea party, today's today's tea party membership is nationwide and composed of people from every nook and cranny in this vast nation, but they feel the same determination to display their anger at the depredations of an out-of-control national government that the Boston patriots showed toward a distant monarch who legend tells us could not speak a word of English, preferring instead his native German.

It's past time for a little tea dumping of our own — the bitter tea brewed by Barack Obama.

Michael Reagan is the son of President Ronald Reagan, a political consultant, and the author of "The New Reagan Revolution" (St. Martin's Press, 2011). He is the founder and chairman of The Reagan Group and president of The Reagan Legacy Foundation. Visit his website at www.reagan.com

© Mike Reagan



Read more on Newsmax.com: Blame Obama for the Wrecked Economy
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!

 



Working for Free: The Economics of Being a Primary Care Physician

Assume a business day of 8 hours. For each hour a family/primary care physician can see 3 patients at 20 minutes each. During each 20 minute visit a doctor has to review a patient’s history, listen to the patient’s complaint or reason for the visit, make a clinical diagnosis on how to best treat the patient’s problem, and assess the patient for signs of any other disease process. All this must be carefully notated in the patient’s chart to track progress and to document the visit for insurance purposes and in rare cases, legal actions.

So the doctor sees 24 patient’s in a day. Assume each patient’s insurance is billed $100 for the visit. Of that $100 the doctor’s practice expects to receive (including patient co-pays) $50. 50% of that $50 is kept by the practice to pay for overhead (medical assistants, receptionists, nurse practitioners, building costs etc). That leaves the doctor $25 per patient.

3 patients an hour means $75 hour, and that equals at 2000 hours a year, $150,000. This is a good wage by most standards. The problem is that doctors don’t work 2000 hours.

As well as seeing 24 patients, the doctor is responsible for managing physician assistants and nurse practitioners. He or she is ultimately responsible for the treatments made by these mid-levels and can be held accountable by the medical board and in court for any mistakes they make. This usually means monitoring what the mid-levels are doing, reviewing their charts, and assisting with their treatment options. This supervision is completely unpaid; the doctor is not reimbursed for his or her time.

Throughout the day test and lab results from current patients arrive on the doctor’s desk. S/he must review these and sign-off on them, adjusting medications or marking for follow-ups as needed. This work is unpaid.

Each refill request made by a patient must be reviewed and signed off by the doctor. He or she is not paid for this work.

20 minutes is not enough time to adequately document a patient’s chart. A doctor will often make quick notes during the patient visit and complete the chart after visiting hours. Charts for those with complex problems and chronic conditions can take upwards of 30-60 minutes to document each visit – all done for free.

When all is said and done, a doctor will spend 8 hours with patients and an additional 4 hours on unpaid tasks, resulting in a 12 hour day. 12 hour days result in working 3000 hours a year*. At $150,000 year (the extreme high end of PCP salaries by the way – the average is more like $125,000), that’s $50 an hour. This is still a good wage, but to receive it a doctor must have done the following:

    Received a 4 year degree.

    Applied to and been accepted to a medical school program. This process is highly competitive and takes at least a year. There is another year delay between acceptance into medical school and actual attendance.

    Graduated medical school in 4 years.

    Completed a 1 year internship.

    Completed a 2-3 year residency. 

It is impossible to work during medical school, so those 4 years of lifetime earnings are lost. During internship and residency, doctors earn $30-35k year. Although the 80 hour week is officially frowned upon by residency programs, interns and residents continue to work these hours. For argument’s sake let’s assume a 60 hour week at $30,000. That’s $10/hour for the first 3 or 4 years of work. In my area cashiers at Wal-mart earn that, do not work more than 40 hours/week and do not have to worry about making a mistake that kills someone.

The average undergraduate finishes college with $23,200 of student loan debt. The cost of applying to medical school, something that isn’t often mentioned, is significant. Figure an additional $5-10k for school applications and interviews, MCAT test and prep, and travel. The average medical school debt is $156,456 – but this assumes the loan amount is paid back immediately upon graduation. No intern working 60 hours a week for $10 an hour can afford to pay that loan back, so the loan is capitalized during residency and soars. That $180,000 in student loan debt can quickly become $300,000 after interest is incurred during the loan forbearance. Student loan repayments are also taxed**, meaning that a physician earning $150,000 will pay 28% tax on his or her loan payments. He or is she is paying $5,600 to the IRS as well as $20,000 a year to the student loan servicing firm, thereby turning that $300,000 loan into a $384,000 one after taxes.

Just for kicks, let’s figure that into our $150,000 salary. So let’s assume loan payments of $20k yearly.
Salary***: $150,000
Taxes: -$42,000 (28% bracket – Federal only)
FICA: -$8,796 (6.2% on $106,800 + 1.45% on $150,000)
Loans: -$20,000
Total: $79,204

And remember: that’s for 12 hour days – not 8.

One would do better as a plumber or in a slew of clerical and office jobs.

And politicians wonder why there aren’t more primary care physicians?

Anything that is free will be abused; therefore the non-patient unpaid activities by primary care physicians have exploded because there is nothing to keep them in check. Patients will not accept charges by a doctor for paperwork or prescription refills, and most doctors aren’t willing to pass on this cost directly to their patients anyway. Likewise insurance companies refuse to pay for the time spent doing paperwork viewing this as part of the original bill; yet insurance companies and Medicaid/Medicare routinely audit charges and payments made to providers, basing payment solely on the time spent with a patient and the clinical diagnosis of the ailment. Anything that strays from the norms set by the insurance company or Medicaid/Medicare auditor is immediately flagged for fraud and the practice is subject to penalty.

This raises another issue with reimbursement: Medicine is the only business where the consumer (the insurer) sets the price for the services provided. If one goes to a salon for a haircut, one does not decide the fee the stylist receives; if one did it would be expected that he or she would pay as little as possible for the service. Doctors may bill for a procedure, but the insurer can pay whatever it believes fair. Doctors are forced to accept the payment and bill the patient for the amount not covered by insurance, or stop accepting insurance from the insurer. This is difficult to do with most private insurers, and illegal with Medicaid and Medicare.
———-

*I forgot to include after hours call. Call schedules can vary from practice to practice, with some practices requiring a physician to cover a week of phone calls every month or two to as much as once every four days demanding in-person hospital admissions. This time too is unpaid but has been left out of this analysis due to the lack of available statistics.

**Student loan interest is tax deductible only up to a cutoff of $75k or so, well below the salaries earned by PCPs.

***Primary Care Physicians are increasingly paid using RVU’s, a system formulated by Medicare and followed by many insurance providers and healthcare systems. In a nutshell this system is a productivity based system in which doctors are paid by the complexity of the visit, the skill treatment requires, and the time expected for treatment as determined by the insurer NOT the provider. Salary is commensurate with the number of RVU’s a physician bills for during a given month minus practice overhead (overhead averages 50-75%). The RVU system requires a doctor to meet his or her RVU quota in order to obtain his or her agreed upon salary; if he or she fails to meet that quota, he or she receives less than that salary.

In this respect physicians are paid more like hourly wage workers whose pay packet directly correlates to the time spent on the job. Work less and one is paid less. Similarly a physician can see fewer patients, but will receive a smaller paycheck at the end of the month.

A doctor might rationalize spending 10 minutes more per patient, believing that the time is necessary to provide decent care. This extra 10 minutes per patient lowers a doctor’s productivity by a third, and ultimately results in a similar-sized hit to his or her paycheck – bringing it down in our above example from $150k to $100k. A doctor might also take a different tact, spending 10 minutes less with each patient in order to increase his productivity by seeing 6 patients instead of 3 per hour. The problem is that the short visit limits the number of RVUs he can bill for that visit. Attempts to bill a 10 minute visit as a 20 minute visit constitute fraud and may result in criminal prosecution or loss of license. Less time spent per patient can indeed result in a higher salary but open the physician up to missed or improper diagnoses and treatments that could result in poor patient outcomes and possible legal action.

 

MUSINGS OF A “MAD MAN” ABOUT JOBS

 

Several of us at “We the People of NC” have always been big fans of prestidigitation, especially the form practiced by magicians, known as slight of hand.  You know the type.  The magician has you concentrating on his one hand while the other hand is pulling your chosen playing card out of the nasal passage of someone in the audience without even grabbing any nose hairs or making the person sneeze.

 

            None of them can compare, however, to the current resident of the White House.  He continues to misdirect us by giving great speeches about jobs.  Just a brief list of some of his quotes show just how sincere he is on the subject.  “I am going to focus like a laser on jobs.”  “I go to sleep every night and wake every morning with one thing on my mind, jobs.”  “JOBS!!  JOBS!!  JOBS!!”  And there are so many other speeches about jobs over the last 32 months. 

 

            A word search found an article in the Washington Post claims Obama mentioned jobs 4261 times in 566 speeches since his inauguration.  Dwell on that factoid for just a moment.  He has been in office approx 850 days.  Take away his golf outings and vacations and he is talking about jobs almost every day.  And still where are the unemployment numbers? 

 

            While the overt number stands at 9.1 %, the real number is much higher at about 11.5%.  If we went back to tracking the numbers in the same way we did in 2006 the numbers are even higher.  In the black community the numbers are astronomical.  Almost 50% of black youth can’t get a job.  And still the silver tongued orator talks about green jobs, union jobs and infrastructure jobs as he distracts us with one hand.

 

            And what is the other hand doing?  Let’s examine.  The Real Estate industry has been hammered and is still falling.  So what does his administration propose to help the situation?  The Federal Housing Finance Agency is planning on suing the banking industry over risky mortgages given out over the last 10 years.  Let’s not even begin to explore the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac involvement in this debacle.  Or the part that government officials had in causing this bubble.  Let’s find a scapegoat and divert attention from the other hand.

 

            In a related story what do big banks like Bank of America need right now to help them out of the problems they face?  More litigation and regulations?  Of course if you are this administration.  Bank of America says they may have to get rid of 30,000 jobs, in part because of the regulations of Dodd/Frank.  So the government decides to sue them and take up more of their time, energy and resources defending ridiculous litigation.  I’ll bet this will make the banking industry want to lend money for mortgages. 

Web Hosting Companies